《鲁滨迅飘流记读后感》_作业帮
《鲁滨迅飘流记读后感》
《鲁滨迅飘流记读后感》
《鲁滨逊漂流记》主要讲述 鲁滨逊漂流到一个荒岛，建立自 己的家园，蓄养打猎时捉来的猎 物，还对抗野人，收养一个名 为“星期五”的野人，教他如何吃 饭，说英语等，最后一支船队航 行到荒岛，把荒岛交给船上的犯 人，几年后，荒岛兴兴向荣，到 处一片繁荣的景象。 读了这篇文章，我不禁对鲁 滨逊佩服得五体投地。鲁滨逊只 是出生在一个普通家庭，并非世 代航海家庭，但他却从事了航海 的工作，真可谓是初生牛犊不怕...
读完《鲁滨孙漂流记》这本精彩的小说后，一个高大的形象时时浮现在我的眼前，他就是勇敢的探险家、航海家鲁滨孙。他凭着顽强的毅力，永不放弃的精神，实现了自己航海的梦想。　　我仿佛看到轮船甲板上站着这样的一个人：他放弃了富裕而又舒适的生活，厌恶那庸庸碌碌的人生，从而开始了一次与死神决斗的生存大挑战。种种的不幸与困难并没有压倒鲁滨孙，反而使他更加坚强。上苍给予鲁滨孙的困难，对于他也更具有挑战性！<...收藏本文到：更多 >>
Copyright &
All Rights Reserved鲁滨迅漂流记300字的读后感要300-200的读后感_作业帮
鲁滨迅漂流记300字的读后感要300-200的读后感
鲁滨迅漂流记300字的读后感要300-200的读后感
《鲁滨逊漂流记》读后感 我读了《鲁滨逊漂流记》这篇小说后,深深被故事中的主人翁鲁滨逊感动,他遭遇海难漂流到荒岛上以后,不是悲叹命运对自己的不公,而是充分利用自己的头脑和双手,修建房子、种植庄稼、养殖动物、制造工具、在绝望和无助中用自己的顽强和毅力与饥饿、疾病等作斗争,最后终于胜利的获救.一开始,鲁滨逊背着自己的父母跟着一只船出海了,但是在一次雨中船遇难了,他在茫茫的大海里漂流了好长时间,最后被海水带到了一个荒无人烟的孤岛上,这个岛上没有人烟,只有他遇难船上的一只狗和两只猫,他企图向来往的船只求救,却发现哪只船上的人是海贼.他用身边仅有的一些物品建了一坐“房子”,后来又在遇难的船上找到了一些面包、酒、衣服、枪弹等等……就这样开始了他长达二十八年两个月零十九天的孤岛漂流.在这么长久的时间里,他不仅要战胜寂寞和孤独,还要战胜饥饿和疾病,更不能让海上的强盗发现他,他总是乐观的面对眼前的一切,珍惜身边每一个可以让他求生的机会,在困难面前他也害怕过,逃避过但最后总是战胜了自己而获得了生的希望.读完这篇小说后,我真的被鲁滨逊的顽强和勇敢深深的感动着,他在哪么艰苦的环境下,把自己从绝望中解救了出来,对我感动最深的是他的毅力,鲁滨逊长达二十几年对生的希望就是毅力,我不禁想到我们自己,我们对生活,对学习是不是也应该向他学习呢?遇到困难是不是也应该勇敢的面对而不在逃避呢?记得我在学习的过程中,经常遇到一些困难,我不是想办法克服它,而是和困难玩起了迷藏,有一次,我对一个数学问题特别的感兴趣,但是始终没有把这件事弄明白,如果我要搞清楚这件事,需要花很多的时间和精力,于是我心安理得的放弃了,可是后来在考试中我又遇到了同一个问题,我还是没有解决掉,我好后悔,我虽然暂时的“绕”开了这个困难,但困难最终又和我遇上了.我们今天在生活中,学习上的困难和鲁滨逊比起来,还是困难吗?我一定要改掉我的坏毛病,遇到困难不再着“绕”着走,而是要像鲁滨逊一样,勇敢的和困难作斗争.朋友,你看过这本书吗?如果没有我建议你看看!你一定也会和我一样感动的!用毅力创造奇迹——读＜鲁滨逊漂流记＞有感 你能独自一人去航海吗?你能独自一人在荒芜人烟的小岛上生活几十年吗?你能在一无所有的情况下用自己的智慧和顽强的毅力创造美好的生活吗?相信你和我都会觉得困难的,但是,有一个人却做到了,他就是笛福笔下的鲁滨逊.一心希望能去航海的鲁滨逊在他19岁那年终于登上了出海的船.可不幸的是他遭到了大风暴,漂到了一个孤岛上,可他毫不畏惧,在一无所有的情况下他以无比顽强的毅力,和一双勤劳的手重新生活,克服种种困难.在小岛上种起了庄稼,养起了牛羊,盖起了房屋.生活30年后,回到了祖国.掩卷深思,我深深地体会到:一个人只要有毅力,有勇往直前的精神,就可以战胜一切困难,创造奇迹.海伦.凯勒不也是这样的吗?海伦出世刚19个月,就得了一场大病,因而失去了视力和听力.所以,在之后的五年中,海伦的家人都对她百般宠爱,什么都听她的,使之成为了一个爱发脾气的“小暴君”.终于,在日海伦刚6岁零9个月时,安妮．莎莉文来到了她家,成了她的家庭教师从此,海伦疯狂地爱上了学习,脾气也好多了．在莎莉文小姐和海伦的共同努力下,1896年10月,海伦进入了剑桥女子中学；1900年,她又进入了哈佛大学德克利夫学院,1904年以优异的成绩毕业．令人惊奇的是：海伦会说话．海伦在英国文学方面十分杰出,她也很爱阅读,虽然有些报纸、小说她不能直接阅读,但通过莎莉文老师及其他人的帮助,她也能够阅读,从而获得了无数知识．她用生命的全部力量处处奔走,建起了一家家慈善机构,为残疾人造福．被美国＜时代周刊＞评选为20世纪美国十大英雄偶像． 海伦．凯勒就用顽强的毅力创造奇迹,我们熟悉的张海迪阿姨也是这样的人． 张海迪她以自己顽强的毅力创造出一生的奇迹．她说的一句话我最受感动：”即使跌倒一百次,我也要一百零一次地站起来．”是啊,如果我们也能向她们一样,那还有什么事不能做到呢?要想出现奇迹,就要靠你顽强的毅力来创造!
读了笛福的《鲁滨逊漂流记》，让我想起一句话：知识就是力量。鲁滨逊能在一个荒无人烟的孤岛上独自生存二十八年，靠的就是他的智慧和劳动：假如他不去劳动，那么他只有被食人族吃掉的可能；假如他没有知识，那么他只有在荒岛上病死的可能。 鲁滨逊用自己的双手在荒野中搭帐篷，掘山洞，打围墙，为自己筑起一个安全坚固的“城堡”，免受食人族的侵害。有了住，还得有吃。从船上运下来的食品虽然不少，但确是有限的，如果...收藏本文到：更多 >>
Copyright &
All Rights Reserved求&鲁滨迅漂流记&中英版_百度知道
求&鲁滨迅漂流记&中英版
想买一本&鲁滨迅漂流记&中英对照版的看看,可版本太多了,不知道买哪个版本的好,最好能告知是哪个出版社的,年份,还有,书中的内容要全些的,有些书中的内容要么不全,要么就东拼西凑的,请了解的朋友给讲明一下,谢谢,可给加分
提问者采纳
纪念鲁宾孙离开赫尔(Hull)的金属装饰片鲁滨孙出身于一个体面的商人家庭，渴望航海，一心想去海外见识一番。他瞒着父亲出海，第一次航行就遇到大风浪，船只沉没，他好不容易才逃出保住性命。第二次出海到非洲经商，赚了一笔钱。第三次又遭不幸，被摩尔人俘获，当了奴隶。后来他划了主人的小船逃跑，途中被一艘葡萄牙货船救起。船到巴西后，他在那里买下一个庄园，做了庄园主。他不甘心于这样的发财致富，又再次出海，到非洲贩卖奴隶。 船在途中遇到风暴触礁，船上水手、乘客全部遇难，唯有鲁滨孙一个人幸存下来，只身飘流到一个杳无人烟的孤岛上。他用沉船的桅杆做了木筏，一次又一次地把船上的食物、衣服、枪支弹药、工具等运到岸上，并在小山边搭起帐篷定居下来。接着他用削尖的木桩在帐篷周围围上栅栏，在帐篷后的山洞凿洞居住。他用简单的工具制作桌、椅等家具，猎野味为食，饮溪里的水，度过了最初遇到的困难。 他开始在岛上种植大麦和稻子，自制木臼、木杵、筛子，加工面粉，烘出了粗糙的面包。他捕捉并驯养野山羊，让其繁殖。他还制作陶器等等，保证了自己的生活需要。虽然这样，鲁滨孙一直没有放弃寻找离开孤岛的办法。他砍倒一棵大树，花了五六个月的时间做成了一只独木舟，但船实在太重，无法拖下海去，只好前功尽弃，重新另造一只小的。 鲁滨孙在岛上独自生活了18年后，一天，他发现岛边海岸上都是人骨，生过火，原来外岛的一群野人曾在这里举行过人肉宴。鲁滨孙惊愕万分。此后他便一直保持警惕，更加留心周围的事物。直到第26年，岛上又来了一群野人，带着准备杀死、吃掉的俘虏。鲁滨孙发现后，救出了其中的一个。鲁滨孙救下那个野人的日子是星期五，所以把被救的土人取名为“星期五”。此后，“星期五”成了鲁滨孙忠实的仆人和朋友。接着，鲁滨孙带着“星期五”救出了一个西班牙人和“星期五”的父亲。不久有条英国船在海岛附近停泊，发现船上的水手发生了叛乱，绑架了船长，把船长、大副等三人抛弃在岛上，鲁滨逊与“星期五”帮助船长制服了那帮水手，夺回了船只。他把那水手留在岛上，船长带着鲁滨孙“星期五”等离开荒岛回到英国。此时鲁滨孙已离家28年。他在英国结了婚，生了三个孩子。妻子死后，鲁滨孙又一次出海经商，路经他住过的荒岛，这时留在岛上的水手和西班牙人都已安家繁衍生息。鲁滨孙又送去新的移民，将岛上的土地分给他们，并留给他们各种日用必需品，满意地离开了小岛。 [[Analysis of Major Characters Robinson Crusoe While he is no flashy hero or grand epic adventurer, Robinson Crusoe displays character traits that have won him the approval of generations of readers. His perseverance in spending months making a canoe, and in practicing pottery making until he gets it right, is praiseworthy. Additionally, his resourcefulness in building a home, dairy, grape arbor, country house, and goat stable from practically nothing is clearly remarkable. The Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau applauded Crusoe’s do-it-yourself independence, and in his book on education, Emile, he recommends that children be taught to imitate Crusoe’s hands-on approach to life. Crusoe’s business instincts are just as considerable as his survival instincts: he manages to make a fortune in Brazil despite a twenty-eight-year absence and even leaves his island with a nice collection of gold. Moreover, Crusoe is never interested in portraying himself as a hero in his own narration. He does not boast of his courage in quelling the mutiny, and he is always ready to admit unheroic feelings of fear or panic, as when he finds the footprint on the beach. Crusoe prefers to depict himself as an ordinary sensible man, never as an exceptional hero. But Crusoe’s admirable qualities must be weighed against the flaws in his character. Crusoe seems incapable of deep feelings, as shown by his cold account of leaving his family—he worries about the religious consequences of disobeying his father, but never displays any emotion about leaving. Though he is generous toward people, as when he gives gifts to his sisters and the captain, Crusoe reveals very little tender or sincere affection in his dealings with them. When Crusoe tells us that he has gotten married and that his wife has died all within the same sentence, his indifference to her seems almost cruel. Moreover, as an individual personality, Crusoe is rather dull. His precise and deadpan style of narration works well for recounting the process of canoe building, but it tends to drain the excitement from events that should be thrilling. Action-packed scenes like the conquest of the cannibals become quite humdrum when Crusoe narrates them, giving us a detailed inventory of the cannibals in list form, for example. His insistence on dating events makes sense to a point, but it ultimately ends up seeming obsessive and irrelevant when he tells us the date on which he grinds his tools but neglects to tell us the date of a very important event like meeting Friday. Perhaps his impulse to record facts carefully is not a survival skill, but an irritating sign of his neurosis. Finally, while not boasting of heroism, Crusoe is nonetheless very interested in possessions, power, and prestige. When he first calls himself king of the island it seems jocund, but when he describes the Spaniard as his subject we must take his royal delusion seriously, since it seems he really does consider himself king. His teaching Friday to call him “Master,” even before teaching him the words for “yes” or “no,” seems obnoxious even under the racist standards of the day, as if Crusoe needs to hear the ego-boosting word spoken as soon as possible. Overall, Crusoe’s virtues tend to be private: his industry, resourcefulness, and solitary courage make him an exemplary individual. But his vices are social, and his urge to subjugate others is highly objectionable. In bringing both sides together into one complex character, Defoe gives us a fascinating glimpse into the successes, failures, and contradictions of modern man. Friday Probably the first nonwhite character to be given a realistic, individualized, and humane portrayal in the English novel, Friday has a huge literary and cultural importance. If Crusoe represents the first colonial mind in fiction, then Friday represents not just a Caribbean tribesman, but all the natives of America, Asia, and Africa who would later be oppressed in the age of European imperialism. At the moment when Crusoe teaches Friday to call him “Master” Friday becomes an enduring political symbol of racial injustice in a modern world critical of imperialist expansion. Recent rewritings of the Crusoe story, like J. M. Coetzee’s Foe and Michel Tournier’s Friday, emphasize the sad consequences of Crusoe’s failure to understand Friday and suggest how the tale might be told very differently from the native’s perspective. Aside from his importance to our culture, Friday is a key figure within the context of the novel. In many ways he is the most vibrant character in Robinson Crusoe, much more charismatic and colorful than his master. Indeed, Defoe at times underscores the contrast between Crusoe’s and Friday’s personalities, as when Friday, in his joyful reunion with his father, exhibits far more emotion toward his family than Crusoe. Whereas Crusoe never mentions missing his family or dreams about the happiness of seeing them again, Friday jumps and sings for joy when he meets his father, and this emotional display makes us see what is missing from Crusoe’s stodgy heart. Friday’s expression of loyalty in asking Crusoe to kill him rather than leave him is more heartfelt than anything Crusoe ever says or does. Friday’s sincere questions to Crusoe about the devil, which Crusoe answers only indirectly and hesitantly, leave us wondering whether Crusoe’s knowledge of Christianity is superficial and sketchy in contrast to Friday’s full understanding of his own god Benamuckee. In short, Friday’s exuberance and emotional directness often point out the wooden conventionality of Crusoe’s personality. Despite Friday’s subjugation, however, Crusoe appreciates Friday much more than he would a mere servant. Crusoe does not seem to value intimacy with humans much, but he does say that he loves Friday, which is a remarkable disclosure. It is the only time Crusoe makes such an admission in the novel, since he never expresses love for his parents, brothers, sisters, or even his wife. The mere fact that an Englishman confesses more love for an illiterate Caribbean ex-cannibal than for his own family suggests the appeal of Friday’s personality. Crusoe may bring Friday Christianity and clothing, but Friday brings Crusoe emotional warmth and a vitality of spirit that Crusoe’s own European heart lacks. The Portuguese Captain The Portuguese captain is presented more fully than any other European in the novel besides Crusoe, more vividly portrayed than Crusoe’s widow friend or his family members. He appears in the narrative at two very important junctures in Crusoe’s life. First, it is the Portuguese captain who picks up Crusoe after the escape from the Moors and takes him to Brazil, where Crusoe establishes himself as a plantation owner. Twenty-eight years later, it is again the Portuguese captain who informs Crusoe that his Brazilian investments are secure, and who arranges the sale of the plantation and the forwarding of the proceeds to Crusoe. In both cases, the Portuguese captain is the agent of Crusoe’s extreme good fortune. In this sense, he represents the benefits of social connections. If the captain had not been located in Lisbon, Crusoe never would have cashed in on his Brazilian holdings. This assistance from social contacts contradicts the theme of solitary enterprise that the novel seems to endorse. Despite Crusoe’s hard individual labor on the island, it is actually another human being—and not his own resourcefulness—that makes Crusoe wealthy in the end. Yet it is doubtful whether this insight occurs to Crusoe, despite his obvious gratitude toward the captain. Moreover, the Portuguese captain is associated with a wide array of virtues. He is honest, informing Crusoe of the money he has borrowed against Crusoe’s investments, and repaying a part of it immediately even though it is financially difficult for him to do so. He is loyal, honoring his duties toward Crusoe even after twenty-eight years. Finally, he is extremely generous, paying Crusoe more than market value for the animal skins and slave boy after picking Crusoe up at sea, and giving Crusoe handsome gifts when leaving Brazil. All these virtues make the captain a paragon of human excellence, and they make us wonder why Defoe includes such a character in the novel. In some ways, the captain’s goodness makes him the moral counterpart of Friday, since the European seaman and the Caribbean cannibal mirror each other in benevolence and devotion to Crusoe. The captain’s goodness thus makes it impossible for us to make oversimplified oppositions between a morally bankrupt Europe on the one hand, and innocent noble savages on the other.
其他类似问题
为您推荐：
其他1条回答
讲述人类与自然的故事我也曾看过，可是相比之下《鲁滨逊漂流记》更真实，更贴切。主人翁鲁滨逊并不是现实生活中的，可是他所做的一切却很清晰，因为他都是用自己的双手做成的。
鲁滨逊这个人物是世界文学中第一个资产阶级正面典型。他出生于一个有着幸福生活的中产阶层生活的家庭，原本他可以安乐地过完一生，可是从小便想遨游四海的念头促使他离开了家，展开了一段刺激的人与自然的生活。鲁滨逊在荒岛上度过了二十八年多的艰苦生活，他利用一艘破船上仅存的一点点人类文明所遗留下的生活资料向大自然展开顽强的斗争。其中，以安顿家园，造独木舟的情节可看出鲁滨逊善于发现和利用的特点。而拯救“星期五”，搭救船长，降伏暴徒的事件，刻画了鲁滨逊坚韧不拔地与大自然作斗争的顽强精神，从而塑造了一个反映...
漂流记的相关知识
等待您来回答
下载知道APP
随时随地咨询
出门在外也不愁